Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:18
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What do you like the most about black people?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
How do people break a narcissist man's ego?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
What was your best experience of having your navel touched?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Consumer sentiment swings sharply higher in June as tariff anxiety recedes - Axios
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What ended your relationship with your best friend?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.